|
Sami Haliby Guarding Agains Narrow
Parochial Views, submitted 7-11-04
This op Ed did not make it in but I had suggeted that Sami send it to the
web. Probably it didn't make it.
Mary Lou Leiser Smith
Coordinator, Coalition for Peace with Justice
Chapel Hill, NC
www.peace-with-justice.org
Tel. (919) 967-5181
Ans.Mach./Fax (919) 967-0829
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 10:35 PM
Subject: Guarding Against Narrow Parochial Views
Mr. Torrey,
Several of my friends have encouraged and
helped me write the subject essay in respect to the worsening situation in
the Mideast. Please consider publishing it and let me know if I can
provide any more information or clarification. If you can think of a
better title please feel free to do so.
Thank you for this courtsey.
Regards,
Sami A. Halaby
7312 Rainwater Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
919 790 8640
Guarding Against Narrow Parochial Views
Sami A. Halaby
Raleigh: It is distressing to contemplate the situation of Jerusalem,
my birthplace, and consider the attitude of our Government in respect to
it, to Palestine, to the separation Wall and to the Mideast. As an
example, consider the recent Congressional Resolution 460, which
supports the Likud/Israeli government. It was passed and encouraged by a
nexus of the Christian Right (including the self-styled Christian
Zionist) and the Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC.) In the former
case their interest results from the group’s peculiar interpretation of
The Book of Revelation while the latter’s overiding interest is to lobby
for the Likud Israeli government. Both wish to work their narrow
parochial interest on the rest of us without regard to American values,
historical precedent or simple justice.
This symbolic congressional action just encourages those in the
current administration who have created a counter-productive Mideast
policy based strictly on ideology and zealotry. It reverses and badly
damages nuanced US policy carefully constructed under all previous
administrations since WW II. Amazingly as a result, Sharon can now, with
impunity, continue to violate numerous UN resolutions and international
law including the latest International Court of Justice ruling. Worse
still it gives the appearance of legitimacy to the acquisition of land
by conquest, poisons our relationship with the Islamic world and
violates the UN charter. Seldom has the common good been subordinated to
such narrowly sectarian concerns.
Add to this the fact that our President and media incessantly beat
the drums of war. We are frequently frightened with the possibility of
being attacked by unreasoning evil doers who, it is said, envy our way
of life. Although the rhetoric has pseudo-religious overtones, we are
reminded that we are not fighting Islam but fight Muslim deviants that
are often referred to as Islamists, Jihadist or Terrorists and a brew of
racism and demonization often being thrown in for good measure. For our
security and in order to protect Israel and our strategic interests, we
are told, we need to respond to the Mideast by military force – "bring
them on, " let's kill them before they kill us. There is no shortage of
spin and some in our midst who would, for parochial reasons, want to
incite a war of civilizations while we are at the height of our power,
have an easier time persuading an indifferent public.
Not surprisingly, there is a mirror image to all this. Where we see
Islamist, Jihadists and Terrorists they see Colonialists, Zionists and
Muslim-haters. The ignorance of each other's culture is enormous. As
things currently stand we supply the arms to an aggressive non-sectarian
Jewish State bent on conquest and a Christian Army occupies Iraq, the
most significant country in their midst. Furthermore we arm, support and
ally ourselves with oppressive dictators while simultaneously expecting
democracy and modernity from the oppressed peoples. This contradictory
muddled policy will not succeed or provide us with security.
It does not have to be this way. Fortunately, better things are being
done to improve the situation and influence policy. For example, quite a
number of Jews insist that. AIPAC does not represent the wider American
Jewish community and similarly millions of Christians proclaim that' the
Christian Right does not represent them. Jewish opinion is historically
liberal; locally for example there are several Jewish groups that are
devoted to promoting a just peace in that region, including Tikkun and
Jews for a Just Peace. Recently, they organized protests against the use
of American-made bulldozers, which Israel uses to demolish Palestinian
houses and Olive Groves by the thousands. This was cosponsored by the
Coalition for Peace with Justice, a local multi-faith organization that
is primarily interested in promoting a just peace in Israel/Palestine.
Mainstream Christian churches on a national basis are conducting monthly
prayer vigils. Each State has different assigned date. Services are held
by participating North Carolina churches, on a rotating basis, on the
fourth day of every month. Moreover, the elders of the Presbyterian
Church (USA) have announced that they will use a strategy successful
against Apartheid to begin targeted divestment of companies invested in
Israel, pressuring for an end to occupation. Many NGOs at considerable
risk to the participants send delegations to the Mideast to lend
encouragement to the Israelis and Palestinians, who have endured the
worse under Sharon, yet persevere in non-violent resistance.
It is important that our government to recognize the danger of
allowing narrow parochial ideologies to dictate major policies. We must
work towards fairness for all in the complicated conflict between Israel
and Palestine, a region whose wellbeing is crucial to us all.
The author was born in Jerusalem, baptized in the Presbyterian Church
and comes from an ancient Easter Rite Christian tradition. He is a
retired scientist who resides in Raleigh.
|