[25 Jun 2003 09:29, N&O Sami Haliby]

Mr. Quarles,

 For a second time in the space of four days the Editors have published an editorial on the Middle East. Those responsible for writing the piece, could benefit from looking a little more critically at the wire services beyond what is locally printed. Of course, it is quite appropriate for an editorial to advance a point of view, it is quite another matter to cite some current events to support a position when the event is still not fully explained or verified. Also, reading both editorials gives the impression of a lack of familiarity with Middle East history. Thus, content suffers from a certain naivete and confused reasoning that does not come up to the standard that one would expect from a quality newspaper.

 More specifically, the editorial, (6/24/03 "On Two Fronts") for example, refers to an attack on a convoy headed for Syria as an example of an aggressive effort to "coral" Saddam Hussein and his sons. News reports not appearing in the N & O, indicate considerable confusion regarding the side of the border in which the attack took place, questions the purpose of conducting the operation and, indeed, what was attacked or even if Hussein et al were the intended targets.

 In another part of the editorial, a rather absurd claim is made that economic oppression is lifting now that Iraqi oil exports have resumed, presumably because the operation is being transferred from Iraqi to US control. Also, mention is made of a new policy, which hopes, for an increase in trade with a population that has been boycotting American products for the last few years. Both assertions belie the well-known historical record of western colonial exploitation of the region and the attendant resistance to it. Based on this record one begins to wonders if the editorial in its zeal to support the President, is not indulging in flights of fancy. 

On the other hand perhaps the intent is to produce a piece that has a nice feel-good style. Like many in this genre it succeeds because it is nicely written, flatters the reader and makes him feel good for living in a country whose unselfish administration promotes such good works. The problem is that the Alice-in-Wonderland quality that it articulates hides severe problems that exist and will become more intense as resistance to US presence in the region increases.

 While it is easy to despair with the amount of spin generated by misinformed journalism, it is better to be vigilant and make sure that issues are openly presented without glossing over unpleasant facts. Do you agree ?

Sami A. Halaby